Which one is faster method.?
You may think string builder or string concate but result is over 1 lakh iterations traditional "+" Operator faster in terms of memory and time.
Why traditional "+" Operator faster:
Reason behind traditional "+" Operator faster is it used String.Concat with length.
compiler convert this piece of code:
to this
To do traditional zippy concatenation like above, don't confuse yourself, just use traditional "+" concatenation that's enough, c# does jobs for you..
1: string str1 = string.Format("{0}{1}{2}{3}{4}","String1","String2","String3","String4","String5");
2: string str2 = new StringBuilder().Append("String1").Append("String2").Append("String3").Append("String4").Append("String5");
3: string str3 = string.Concat(new string [] { "String1", "String2", "String3", "String4", "String5"});
4: string str4 = "String1" + "String2" + "String3" + "String4" + "String5";
You may think string builder or string concate but result is over 1 lakh iterations traditional "+" Operator faster in terms of memory and time.
Why traditional "+" Operator faster:
Reason behind traditional "+" Operator faster is it used String.Concat with length.
compiler convert this piece of code:
1: string str = "String1" + "String2" + "String3" + "String4" + "String5";
1: string str = String.Concat(new Object[] { "String1", "String2", "String3", "String4", "String5"});
To do traditional zippy concatenation like above, don't confuse yourself, just use traditional "+" concatenation that's enough, c# does jobs for you..
No comments:
Post a Comment